Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer


New page reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Shortcuts
Please read the guidelines for granting this right before making a request.

User:Rahmatula786

I am reapplying for the new page reviewer role after my initial request was declined because now I realize I had applied prematurely. Since then, I have gained some experience, refined my understanding of Wikipedia’s policies, and have been actively contributing to the Articles for Creation (AfC) review process. This has not only strengthened my ability to assess new articles but has also given me useful experience in engaging constructively with editors.

I am well-versed with Wikipedia’s guidelines, particularly regarding notability, verifiability, and neutrality. My strength is my ability to remain unbiased while reviewing, and I always strive to improve by learning from my mistakes. Though my registered account is only a few months old, I have been editing Wikipedia for a long time, which has given me substantial familiarity with its norms and regulations.

I have been enjoying reviewing AfC drafts, and this experience has encouraged me to take on a more active role in maintaining Wikipedia’s quality. I now feel myself confident that I can handle this responsibility and would greatly appreciate the opportunity to contribute as a new page reviewer.

Thank you for your time and consideration. Best regards, Rahmatula786 (talk) 17:12, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 17:20, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Rahmatula786: What do you mean by though my registered account is only a few months old, I have been editing Wikipedia for a long time – did you have another account before this one? – Joe (talk) 08:42, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No Sir, Before creating this account, I used to edit Wikipedia anonymously and made various contributions. However, after realizing the benefits of having a registered account, I created this one and have since been actively editing and contributing regularly. Rahmatula786 (talk) 09:33, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) Why did you reject this submission?[2] topic is notable.. it's seems you don't have knowledge about notability guidelines. Hellorld4 (talk) 01:10, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have replied on your talk page. Rahmatula786 (talk) 04:09, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Junbeesh

I would like to request NPR rights to contribute more effectively to this area and help reduce the backlog at NPP. I have created 18 articles and have been actively involved in patrolling new pages, tagging non-notable and promotional content for CSD and AfD. Many of the articles I have nominated for CSD or AfD have been deleted, which I believe reflects my understanding of Wikipedia's notability and content policies. With NPR rights, I will be able to continue this work more efficiently. I am familiar with relevant guidelines and policies and would appreciate the opportunity to help out in this area. Thanks for your time and consideration! Junbeesh (talk) 07:43, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done for 3 months. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:14, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Upjav

I've been an editor for a while and have experience in article creation (mainly on the shorter side for more niche areas with fewer sources) and have a few DYKs under my belt. Think my knowledge of policy demonstrated through this makes me a good fit for these permissions. Upjav (talk) 20:33, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As a further note, I'd like to review new pages. Upjav (talk) 02:17, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Just out of pure morbid interest - you reviewed the first page I created back in 2014! Did it all work differently back then or something - like not needing the reviewer right? Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:42, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yooooooooooo that's awesome! It didn't require a permission back then (this became a thing in Oct 2016), and I think I was inactive in page review around that time so I didn't notice and didn't apply. Most of what I do is article creation in niche areas, so I haven't bothered to apply. Upjav (talk) 17:25, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you left a kind word with your review back then and it's stuck with me since, so you were clearly doing NPP right!!! :) Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:42, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Done for 1 month. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:16, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:JustARandomEditor123

I wish to apply for New Page Reviewer permissions to deal with the large backlog of unreviewed pages. I have participated in many AfD discussions, which proves my understanding of Wikipedia's content policies and notability guidelines. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 10:48, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@JustARandomEditor123, can you comment on Draft:Tarana Quarry railway station and how your understanding your notability has changed since then (ideally ditto for Litophyton columnaris). Sohom (talk) 21:47, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
After the article on Tarana Quarry railway station was moved to the draftspace for not having enough references (only 1 source was present at the time), I learned that articles required multiple reliable, independent sources that go into detail about the topic were required to demonstrate notability, leading to the draft now having 6 references to meet WP:GNG. As for the Litophyton columnaris article, I learned that articles that have been created in another language version of Wikipedia should only be translated if they meet the notability requirements of English Wikipedia, and should not be translated through machine-generated means such as Google Translate. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 09:00, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mekomo

I have temporary NPP right which will expire in few days, I kindly request renewal of this right to continue reviewing articles. Thank you. Mekomo (talk) 14:33, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 28 March 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 14:40, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Rosguill do you want this one? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:29, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
HJ Mitchell I’m generally fine with other admins reviewing track records for people whom I conferred trial runs to (and arguably the extra set of eyes is a good thing). My activity has been rather inconsistent lately in particular due to other demand on my time so I would expect others to step in more signed, Rosguill talk 22:52, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Done for further 3 month trial. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:53, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:CSMention269

I am an AFC reviewer asking for another trial or permanent permission for this flag. Last time, it was granted by @Sohom Datta: for a 2-month trial after the first month trial was successful. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 04:37, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Sohom Datta (expires 00:00, 6 April 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 04:40, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like somebody that is not me to take a look at this request. Sohom (talk) 22:39, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Moritoriko

Hello, I have 1 denied applied about a month ago because I didn't have 500 undeleted Main space edits at the time. I now have 501 so I am reapplying for temporary permissions. I have a decent amount of experience going through AfDs and source searching to check if they are notability. Moritoriko (talk) 06:40, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot talk 06:40, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:AstrooKai

I would like to expand my contributions to Wikipedia by helping address the extensive backlog at NPP. I have been an active participant in the AfC process as a probationary reviewer for multiple months, and I regularly take part in AfDs and occasionally in PRODs within the scope of WP:PHILIPPINES. While I understand that my impact on the backlog may not be significant in terms of numbers, I am committed to performing thorough, policy-aligned reviews to the best of my ability. AstrooKai (Talk) 19:32, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done for 3 months. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:27, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Afonso Dimas Martins

I believe I meet most criteria. Plus I already review scientific articles irl, so I would say I have some experience on reviewing in general. Here to help where needed. Afonso Dimas Martins (talk) 16:31, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) @Afonso Dimas Martins: It appears that you don't have any AFD votes. I suggest try to engage yourself with WP:AFD. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 15:40, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am not as much interested in deletion, rather on creation. This was a request to become a reviewer of new articles after all, not a judge of articles that need to be deleted. Afonso Dimas Martins (talk) 15:42, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Afonso Dimas Martins: NPP is about reviewing if article is good enough (i.e. notable enough) for wikipedia. AFD votes are proof that you are aware and know what is or is not for Wikipedia. Plus, knowing AFD is part of the criterion for granting Have a good knowledge of content policies and guidelines and an understanding of quality control processes. This is typically demonstrated by prior participation in one or a combination of the following areas: The deletion processes, i.e. AfD, PROD, and CSD. This is base on my own experience as a once got decline due to lacking AFD votes. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 07:55, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Afonso Dimas Martins If this helps, Wikipedia has its own arcane set of standards for what topics can be included -- it doesn't always even matter what text is in the article, just whether reliable sources exist talking about it (see the general notability guideline). Essentially, there is a requirement that you have experience arguing about whether articles meet the criteria before you are able to mark new pages as reviewed, which means among other things you think they meet the criteria. Mrfoogles (talk) 00:55, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you both @Miminity and @Mrfoogles for your response. It wasn't clear for me this should be a criteria for reviewers, but it makes sense. I will keep an eye on the AfD backlog and see where I can contribute. Afonso Dimas Martins (talk) 16:55, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ambrosiawater

Hello, I was given the New Page Reviewer rights as a one-month trial. This permission will expire on 20 April 2025. During this time, I have been doing active reviewing of new pages and learning more about notability, reliable sources, and the CSD/PROD/AfD process. I tried always to be careful and make constructive reviews. I really want to keep helping with this work. So I would like to ask if possible to renew or give the reviewer rights permanently, depending on my work this last month. Thanks a lot for your time and consideration. Ambrosiawater (talk) 09:56, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 10:00, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Old-AgedKid

I've been active on Wikipedia for over two years, during which I've created 130+ articles, with 1 being deleted. I've also participated in numerous AfD discussions, been active as an AfC reviewer, and have a profound understanding of Wikipedia's notability guidelines and importance of reliable in-depth coverage in reliable sources. I'd like to help reduce the backlog of unreviewed articles and try a role of NPP. I don't hurry and review the pages carefully when nominating articles for deletion, accepting AfC submissions, and patrolling newly published pages. I hope to become a valuable team-member of the patroller community. Old-AgedKid (talk) 16:09, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:29, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fade258

Hi, Currently I am an AFC reviewer and I would like to request for new page reviewer permission right, and I have read Wikipedia's policies and guidelines as requested. Thank you Fade258 (talk) 09:21, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done for 3 months. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:23, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Abo Yemen

I want to help with the WP:MAY25 backlog :) 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 08:27, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done for 3 months. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:49, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Johnson524

I wish to apply for NPR rights. In the three years I've contributed to the encyclopedia, I have created 76 articles on a wide variety of topics and 17 Good Articles. I feel confident in my ability to review new articles, and would particularly like to help out in the backlog drive taking place next month. Cheers from North Carolina! 🙂 Johnson524 07:02, 26 April 2025 (UTC) Johnson524 07:02, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:45, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Noleander

My home page showed banner at the top asking for volunteers to help with Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2025. I'm happy to help. I've got 19 years experience on WP; 38,000 edits (all hand-crafted, no bots); promoted five Featured Articles, created over 90 articles, and performed about 100 detailed article reviews (FA, GA, or Peer Review). If the admins don't mind, I'd prefer indefinite duration, so I don't have to re-apply every time there is a backlog-elimination drive. Noleander (talk) 23:31, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:42, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Zzz plant

Hi, I would like to apply for a trial run of NPR so I can help with the upcoming backlog drive. I have participated in AfD for a while now and also recently started AfC and CSD. I've created one article and done substantial re-works to a handful of others. I believe I have a solid grasp on notability, copyvio, and other key policies. Thank you for your consideration, Zzz plant (talk) 06:00, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, for 3 months. Sohom (talk) 16:33, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mateus2019

I have created 158 articles and lists (+ some categories) within a 15+ year time span and would like to have a one to three month try-out to help with the backlog starting this May. I would work in the areas of human geography, transport and visual arts. Most people know my be User:Scriberius (cannot log-in anymore because I've lost the password). Thanks, --Mateus2019 (talk) 07:00, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:HilssaMansen19

I would like to request temporary rights to contribute to Wikipedia by reviewing new pages as there is a huge backlog. I have been working on Wikipedia for past few months as an active user. During this time period, I have learnt a lot of things and learning something new every time I work here. Before these 2 months, I had a little experience on creating pages and within this time period, I started contributing by expanding older or creating new articles mostly within similar topic base. I would be glad to contribute to Wikipedia by reviewing new pages and also, learn along the way. I will also be working with the editors of new articles which might be notable but lack sources or other requirements. Thus, I am requesting a temporary grant of this right and I will prove for further grant by doing worthy work. HilssaMansen19 (talk) 09:52, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Main reason is, I wish to join the May Backlog drive and contribute there. I have created several articles, including some years back after which I was inactive for long. I participated in AfD patrol before being inactive and recently engaging in a good way as well.
  • A temporary grant is requested through this request.
  • I will prove the granted right worthy enough through great work to retain it for further period as well.

HilssaMansen19 (talk) 10:22, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:AlphaBetaGamma

Requesting temp NPR rights since I'm considering joining the backlog drive. I have some experience in AFC reviewing and CSDs. Hope that's enough record to prove my competence. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 10:39, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:20, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:ClaudineChionh

I had been planning to request AfC permission but the May backlog drive prompted me to request NPP instead. I am a long-term gnome, vandal-fighter, rollbacker, and occasional Teahouse helper. Since returning from my last wikibreak I have familiarised myself with current policies and contentious topics and am developing a nose for LLM and copyvio content. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 14:44, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Smartypants327

I would like to have this flag because I like proofreading and making sure articles are factual and concise. I am a writer for The Griffins' Nest as well. Smartypants327 (talk) 17:53, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) @Smartypants327: It seems like you don't have any WP:AFD votes. Try participating in the WP:AFD process first. Participation on AFD is one of the requirements for being an WP:NPR. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 01:24, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lollipoplollipoplollipop

Requesting temporary rights to participate in WP:MAY25. Been an editor for a decade now with some experience in AfD, PRODs, and creating new articles so I hope I'll be able to help out with the drive. //Lollipoplollipoplollipop::talk 19:05, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Valorrr

I understand that the guideline is atleast 90 days on Wikipedia, but I have been Granted PCR, and I believe I can help with the huge backlog of articles/redirects shown at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers, with the oldest article spanning 4 years, and over 18,000 articles to review.

Per the Criteria, it states;
These criteria are guidelines; meeting them does not constitute a right to the permission. At their discretion, administrators may grant the permission to editors who do not meet the strict criteria but that they otherwise deem to be competent, or may ask for additional experience. Typically, consistent recent activity is required, to ensure that reviewers are familiar with current policy and guidelines. Activity on other Wikimedia projects is not taken into consideration.
It doesn't mean that I have to follow the strict criteria, but it is up to the Administrators, discretion.

And I can have it revoked at any time, per the same article but guidelines for revocation per this;
The user right can be revoked for violating any of the above conduct standards and for other misconduct. Additionally, it can be revoked at any time by an administrator without any process or prior notice in any of the following circumstances:
The editor has demonstrated a pattern of performing obviously controversial reviews without first determining consensus.
The editor has demonstrated a pattern of failing to exercise sufficient care when reviewing pages, resulting in users being offended or discouraged (especially new users).
The editor has used the permission as leverage in disputes or used any project tools in any improper way.
The editor has performed any blatant vandalism (not limited to page reviewer vandalism).
The editor has failed to report to an administrator after noticing unauthorized use of their account or otherwise neglected account security practices.
The editor has been inactive for 12 months or more.
The editor has accepted or solicited payment in return for reviews.

And of May 2023, new page reviewers are granted access to AFC, but the section states;
As of May 2023, new page reviewers are able to accept and decline submitted drafts in draftspace without applying to become an AFC reviewer at WT:AFCP. You can use Special:NewPagesFeed to find submitted drafts. Reviewing a draft involves activating the AFC Helper Script in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets, then visiting a submitted draft. The AFC helper script will display at the top of the page, giving you the option to accept, decline, reject, or comment. The procedure for reviewing drafts is located at WP:AFCR. It is very similar to new page patrolling, with one difference being that all WP:GNG passing sources must be located in the draft, or it can be declined as non-notable. Any questions about AFC reviewing should be directed to WT:AFC.

I wish for you to consider my request, I am positive that I may receive this, but there is no promise on this as it is up to the administrators discretion, not mine.

Thank you for considering this,
~~~~ Valorrr (lets chat) 20:29, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 41 days. — MusikBot talk 20:40, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Thank you for volunteering, but in reviewing your editing history I wasn't able to find sufficient experience with the deletion process or evaluating content. I encourage you to spend some time at WP:AFD and make policy based votes to show that you're familiar with our policies and comfortable evaluating notability. Alternatively, you can still apply to help out at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:47, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Czarking0

Looking to begin participating. I already review AfC and want to engage in the May drive. Czarking0 (talk) 05:58, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:LunaEclipse

Requesting a renewal as my NPP rights are going to expire in a week. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 11:51, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Elli (expires 00:00, 12 May 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 12:00, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:WormEater13

Hi there! I am requesting a NPP trial, particularly for WP:MAY25. I am pretty experienced in CSP, RPP, AfD, and AfC. All the articles that I have created have never been deleted or nominated for AfD either, and i've significantly rewritten quite a few articles. I primarily do recent changes patrol and AfD - but recently, i've been granted AfC reviewer, so i've been doing quite a bit of AfC reviews. I believe that I am extensively knowledgable about Wikipedia's 3 core principles - WP:V, WP:N, and WP:NPOV. I would love to help clean up the NPP backlog with the May 2025 drive! WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 16:44, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([4]). — MusikBot talk 16:50, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Villkomoses

Hello fellow editors! I'd like to apply for NPR rights. For a while now, I've been contributing in various ways—editing and translating articles, participating in AfD-related activities (both nominating and voting), helping with the welcoming committee, etc.—and I would appreciate it if the community granted me the opportunity to participate in NPR. I believe my knowledge and the experience I've gained from participating in AfD discussions make me eligible for this role.Villkomoses (talk) 14:50, 29 April 2025 (UTC) Villkomoses (talk) 14:50, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hmr

I have been on Wikipedia since my teens and would now like to help with patrolling pages through WP:MAY25 and at least the summer. I have considerable experience with Wikipedia content work and the AFD process. Hmr (talk) 18:06, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quelle: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/New_page_reviewer
Apr. 30 2. Speedway Bundesliga MSC Cloppenburg Fighters 0 MC Bergring Teterow 0 MSC Olching 0 Inn Isar Racing Team 0 Mai 6 2. Speedway Bundesliga MC Bergring Teterow 0 MSC Olching 0 Inn Isar Racing Team 0 DMV White Tigers Diedenbergen 0 Mai 17 1. Speedway Bundesliga MSC Wölfe Wittstock 0 MC Güstrow Torros 0 Mai 25 2. Speedway Bundesliga Inn Isar Racing Team 0 DMV White Tigers Diedenbergen 0 MSC Cloppenburg Fighters 0 MC Bergring Teterow 0